One reporter apologized to the town of Sutherland Springs for the massive onslaught of media that descended into the small Texas town after the shooting at the First Baptist Church there. Yet this event spawned several important stories that needed to be told. Where do we draw the line? When does the coverage go over the top?
The Washington Post’s Margaret Sullivan argues that President Trump’s drumbeat of criticism of reporters as distrustful is sinking in with Americans.
In West Virginia, it must be illegal for reporters to question authority, especially federal authorities.
A West Virginia reporter was arrested for trying to get an answer from Health and Human Services Director Tom Price about whether domestic violence was considered a pre-existing condition under the Republican-backed health-care bill.
Or, as his lawyer puts it, he was arrested “for talking too loud.”
Journalism has always had a tinge of danger to it. Reporters die covering wars. Investigative reporters can face violence for uncovering scandals and speaking truth to power. Journalists can be thrown into jail for contempt of court for failing to reveal sources. But what is happening to journalists in Turkey lately, is appalling. It’s downright scary when those in power lock up journalists by the dozens simply because the powers that be don’t like what journalists are writing and to muffle voices of opposition. Thank goodness the supreme law of the United States – the First Amendment – prevents this type of wholesale silencing of the press.
In Germany, officials are working on it. A new social media bill being considered by Germany would force social media giants such as Facebook and Twitter to remove quickly fake news that incites hate or criminal content. The penalty for failing to remove “fake news?” Fifty million Euros, about $53 million.
While that may sound as if it’s an ideal method to stop fake news, critics contend the bill goes too far and could limit free speech.
Chancellor Angela Merkel’s cabinet, though, favors the bill, giving it a good chance for passage in the German Parliament.
The number of firms that has withdrawn its advertising from Fox’s The O’Reilly Factor has grown to 30 in the wake of allegations, first published in the NY Times, that Fox has paid $13 million to several women who claim the show’s star, Bill O’Reilly, sexually harassed them.
Angie’s List, which provides online reviews of local businesses, is not one of those 30. It said it would let its customers make their own decisions about media consumption. In June, Angie’s List reported a total revenue of $83 million.
Despite President Trump’s defense of Fox commentator Bill O’Reilly, as many as 18 advertisers have pulled their ads from his popular show in the wake of a story written by the N.Y. Times that noted Fox had paid $13 million to settle several sexual harassment claims against the star of the Fox network.
The boycott grew quickly after the allegations, some as old as 15 years, were detailed in the Times story.
President Trump called O’Reilly a “good person” and said he didn’t think the TV commentator “did anything wrong.”
Mercedes Benz and Hyundai withdrew their ads on The O’Reilly Factor after the NY Times reported that Fox spent $13 million to settle sexual harassment claims against it’s star, Bill O’Reilly. But since O’Reilly’s show made Fox nearly $450 million from 2014-16, how many more advertisers would have to bail on the show before Fox would abandon it?
I don’t put much stock into what celebrities say about politics. But this is the 45th anniversary of the Democratic break-in at the Watergate hotel in Washington, D.C. And actor Robert Redford, playing Pulitizer Prize-winning journalist Bob Woodward, did make an Academy Award-winning movie about the scandal called “All the President’s Men.” So he does have some relevance when he writes in the Washington Post that dangerous similarities exist between the Watergate era and now. The question is: Will we the truth again be told?
Fox has paid $13 million to settle sexual harassment claims against its star, Bill O’Reilly, according to the N.Y. Times. But since his show made Fox $446 million in advertising from 2014-16, Fox will probably put up with a few more harassment claims and payouts. O’Reilly denies the claims have merit, the Times report states.